What Is Raiding Agreement

Oct 15, 2021   //   by admin   //   Uncategorized  //  No Comments

With increasing competition between companies that share the same industry, there were privacy forms that employees had to sign to prevent employee raids. The extreme difficulty of verifying this is an important example of how it poses a threat to all businesses. Employee theft or poaching can hold the hiring company accountable according to many legal theories. In the modern world, hiring a single employee away from a competitor can potentially result in liability for unauthorized interference. Hiring five or ten employees of a competitor can potentially lead to many grounds for action. The following discussion focuses on various theories of liability for employee theft. First, regardless of the non-compete clauses, the hiring company is always the target of trade secrets being misappropriated. In Florida, these claims are governed by the Florida Uniform Trade Secrets Act, Florida Statutes 688.001. Most states have passed the same law (the UTSA). Given this potential exposure, the hiring company should always: Contact Ms. Dolghih at (214) 949-4458 or Leiza.Dolghih@GodwinLewis.com for confidential advice regarding your anti-raid agreement or if you wish to implement anti-raid agreements to protect your business. Anti-raid clauses are also often used in contracts with suppliers, customers, subcontractors, licensees, and franchisees to ensure that they do not kidnap key employees from the business to remove the business or reduce their costs. Contact us to speak to a lawyer about negotiating an employment contract or resolving a dispute over an employment contract.

Gaining a competitive advantage by keeping key employees away from a competitor was once a daily occurrence. The practice quickly fell out of favour as almost every jurisdiction in the United States, including Virginia, regularly accepted and applied legal advocacy for unauthorized interference with contractual relationships and business expectations. The application of this legal theory has gained a footr in recent years, as the high-tech industry increasingly relies on the creative efforts and innovations of employees and individual entrepreneurs – people who are in high demand and often find lucrative financial offers from competitors irresistible. This article is designed to help companies understand and protect their legal rights when key employees are assaulted. It is also designed to alert the attacking competitor and individual employees or contractors to the risks and possible consequences that may result from a change in loyalty. Finally, this article addresses the arguably unanswered question of how Virginia law defines protectable “business expectations” in which you should not interfere. Back to the positive factors: In the above hypothesis, there were no more factors. Let`s mix things up: ABC and Z Corp were in talks about a possible merger. As part of these conversations, ABC had the opportunity to break into Z Corp and speak with a number of Z Corp employees. Halfway through the merger negotiations, ABC decides it has no interest in a merger, but wants to continue discussions so that it can continue to gather information about Z Corp. Meanwhile, ABC has learned who the main players in Z Corp are.

Negotiations hit a wall, with ABC closing merger negotiations and then hiring 15 prominent Z Corp. employees.


Our partners

Hotcakes New Media - A refreshingly unique creative company.

Hotcakes New Media is a full service creative company in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. We produce a wide range of rich media in-house for our clients. Whether you need animation, video production, post-production, illustration, graphic design, branding, or web design, Hotcakes New Media is here to help.